"Wow, red flag..."

A list of behaviors and personality attributes commonly associated with toxic relationships.

Emotional manipulation

  • Blame-shifting — Making their behavior your responsibility.
  • DARVO — Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender when confronted.
  • Deflection — Redirecting a discussion away from their behavior; whataboutism is a common form.
  • Double binds — Creating situations where either choice can be used against you.
  • Emotional blackmail — Using fear, obligation, or guilt to force compliance.
  • Emotional hostage-taking — Making you responsible for keeping them emotionally stable.
  • Feigning helplessness — Weaponized incompetence: intentionally claiming or performing inability so responsibility shifts to another person.
  • Gaslighting — Repeatedly undermining your confidence in your memory, perception, or judgment.
  • Guilt-tripping — Making you feel selfish, cruel, or ungrateful for not doing what they want.
  • Impossible standards — Expectations designed so you can never quite succeed.
  • Manufactured urgency — Pressuring you to decide before you have time to think.
  • Martyrdom — Conspicuously suffering or sacrificing so that you feel indebted.
  • Moving the goalposts — Changing what is required of you after you meet an expectation.
  • Playing the victim — Portraying themselves as the injured party to escape accountability or control your response.
  • Scorekeeping — Treating favors and affection as debts you must repay.
  • Threatening abandonment — Repeatedly threatening to leave, divorce, break up, etc. to obtain compliance.
  • Threatening self-harm — Using threats of self-injury or suicide as leverage to prevent someone from leaving or setting a boundary.
  • Ultimatums — Using threats of consequences to force a choice, particularly where ordinary negotiation would be possible.
  • Weaponized vulnerability — Using disclosures, distress, trauma, or emotional crises to prevent you from setting boundaries.

Distorting reality

  • Bad-faith interpretation — Consistently choosing the least charitable interpretation of what you say.
  • Circular arguments — Keeping an argument going without allowing resolution.
  • Conversation hijacking — Making every discussion about their feelings or grievances.
  • Half-truths — Presenting selected facts in a way that creates a misleading impression.
  • Interrogation — Demanding exhaustive explanations for ordinary behavior.
  • Invalidation — Treating your feelings or experiences as illegitimate.
  • Lying — Knowingly giving false information to mislead or avoid accountability.
  • Lying by omission — Withholding material information so that someone reaches a false conclusion.
  • Maintaining a secret committed relationship — Concealing another committed relationship or presenting an agreed-upon monogamous relationship as exclusive when it is not.
  • Minimization — Portraying a concern, experience, or harm as insignificant, unimportant, or ridiculous.
  • Plausible deniability — Behaving in ways that are deliberately difficult to call out or prove.
  • Projection — Accusing you of motives or behaviors that are actually theirs.
  • Putting words in your mouth — Straw-manning: misrepresenting what someone said or believes so it is easier to dismiss or attack.
  • Revisionist history — Repeatedly rewriting what happened to favor their position.
  • Sealioning — Relentless supposedly-reasonable questioning used to exhaust you rather than understand you.
  • Selective memory — Conveniently “forgetting” agreements or incidents.
  • Semantic arguments — Obsessing over wording to avoid addressing the substance of a complaint.

Affection as a means of control

  • Boundary testing — Making small violations to discover what you will tolerate.
  • Conditional love — Communicating that affection depends upon compliance.
  • Forced intimacy — Pushing emotional, sexual, financial, or practical closeness faster than you want.
  • Future faking — Making grand promises about a shared future without genuine intention or follow-through.
  • Grooming — Gradually establishing trust, dependency, secrecy, or normalized boundary violations in preparation for exploitation or abuse.
  • Hoovering — Attempting to pull someone back into a harmful relationship after separation, often through affection, apologies, promises, or crises.
  • Hot-and-cold behavior — Intermittent reinforcement: an unpredictable alternation between affection or reward and rejection or mistreatment.
  • Idealization — Placing you on a pedestal in an intense or unrealistic way.
  • Love bombing — Overwhelming someone with affection, attention, promises, gifts, or commitment, particularly to accelerate intimacy or create dependency.
  • Mirroring — Strategically copying your interests, values, personality, or aspirations to manufacture a sense of extraordinary compatibility.
  • Premature commitment — Aggressively pushing exclusivity, marriage, moving in, etc.
  • Withholding affection — Deliberately removing warmth or intimacy as punishment or leverage.

Punishment and conflict tactics

  • “Jokes” at your expense — Especially when objections are answered with “you're too sensitive.”
  • Belittling — Belittling, mockery, or ridicule that makes someone feel small, incapable, or unworthy.
  • Contempt — Treating someone with scorn, disgust, or a sense of superiority.
  • Destroying property — Damaging belongings or surroundings to frighten, punish, or assert power.
  • Humiliation — Causing shame or embarrassment to diminish someone or gain control over them, especially in public.
  • Intimidation — Using fear, implied power, or threatening conduct to influence someone’s choices.
  • Menacing body language — Using posture, proximity, gestures, or facial expressions to make someone feel afraid.
  • Name-calling — Using insulting labels to demean someone or undermine their self-worth.
  • Needling / baiting — Deliberately provoking a reaction and then criticizing the reaction.
  • Punching walls / throwing objects — Violence around someone can function as intimidation even when they aren't physically struck.
  • Rage episodes — Explosive anger that leaves others afraid, silenced, or focused on managing the outburst.
  • Reactive-abuse baiting — Provoking someone toward an extreme response and then using it to characterize them as the aggressor.
  • Silent treatment — Deliberately refusing communication as punishment or control.
  • Stonewalling — Persistently shutting down attempts to discuss problems.
  • Threats — Stating or implying harmful consequences to force compliance or create fear.
  • Veiled threats — Hinting at harmful consequences without saying them directly.
  • Withholding as punishment or leverage — Deliberately withholding contact, support, affection, information, or cooperation as punishment or leverage.

Control and coercion

  • Coercive control — An ongoing pattern of restrictions, intimidation, and dependency that erodes another person’s autonomy.
  • Controlling access to money — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling clothing or appearance — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling food — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling friendships — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling hobbies — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling medical care — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling sleep — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling transportation — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Controlling work or education — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Demanding constant updates — Continually demanding updates about someone's whereabouts or activities, including immediate response expectations.
  • Demanding permission for ordinary independent decisions. — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Double standards — Freedoms for themselves that they deny you.
  • Economic sabotage — Interfering with employment, credit, education, etc. to make independence harder.
  • Excessive rule-making — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Financial abuse — Restricting, exploiting, or sabotaging finances to make someone dependent.
  • Gatekeeping resources — Controlling access to essentials such as money, housing, transportation, or information.
  • Household labor inequality — Consistently expecting one partner to carry an unfair share of domestic work, care work, or planning.
  • Jealousy or possessiveness framed as care — Controlling conduct portrayed as protection, care, or love.
  • Micromanagement — Excessively directing everyday decisions or tasks to reduce another person’s independence.
  • Non-consensual location tracking — Demanding access to, placing, or using an app or device to track someone's movements or location without their agreement.
  • Password demands — Restricting everyday choices, access, or freedom in ways that increase dependence and reduce autonomy.
  • Reproductive coercion — Interfering with contraception, pregnancy decisions, or reproductive autonomy.
  • Sexual coercion — Pressure, threats, guilt, persistence, or retaliation used to obtain sexual activity rather than freely given consent.

Social isolation

Jealousy and possessiveness

Social manipulation

  • Comparison — Repeatedly comparing you unfavorably with exes, friends, siblings, etc.
  • Jealousy induction — Intentionally making you jealous to increase your investment or insecurity.
  • Playing people against one another — Creating rivalry or conflict between people to gain influence or control.
  • Public/private personality switching — Behaving charmingly around others while treating you very differently in private.
  • Recruiting allies — Bringing friends/family into a conflict to overwhelm you.
  • Smear campaigns — Spreading damaging claims to undermine your reputation or credibility—often called character assassination—particularly after confrontation or separation.
  • Splitting — Casting people as entirely good or bad and abruptly reversing that view in ways that create conflict, instability, or pressure.
  • Third-party pressure or harassment — Using other people or shared contacts to pressure, monitor, intimidate, relay messages, or bypass boundaries.
  • Triangulation — Involving a third person to create jealousy, pressure, rivalry, or validation.
  • Using children as leverage — Using children, access to them, or concerns about them to pressure or control someone.

Undermining your confidence

  • Approval withholding — Keeping validation perpetually just out of reach.
  • Attacking your identity — Targeting someone’s confidence, identity, or vulnerabilities to make them easier to control.
  • Chronic criticism — Persistently finding fault in ways that erode confidence and make approval feel unattainable.
  • Competence undermining — Repeatedly making you doubt your ability to handle things yourself.
  • Devaluation — Shifting from idealizing you to treating you as inferior or worthless.
  • Eroding self-trust — Repeatedly causing someone to doubt their judgment, feelings, or ability to make decisions.
  • Goal sabotage — Interfering with things that would make you more confident or independent.
  • Infantilization — Treating an adult partner like a child incapable of making decisions.
  • Making you prove your worth — Keeping acceptance or affection conditional on continual demonstrations of value.
  • Negging — Calculated backhanded compliments or insults intended to lower confidence and increase desire for approval.
  • Pathologizing normal reactions — Describing reasonable anger, sadness, or disagreement as evidence that you're “crazy,” “unstable,” etc.
  • Weaponizing diagnoses or therapy language — Targeting someone’s confidence, identity, or vulnerabilities to make them easier to control.
  • Weaponizing insecurities — Targeting someone’s confidence, identity, or vulnerabilities to make them easier to control.
  • Weaponizing past trauma — Targeting someone’s confidence, identity, or vulnerabilities to make them easier to control.
  • Weaponizing secrets — Using private information to shame, threaten, or control someone.

Boundary violations

Physical safety and freedom

Accountability

  • Avoiding meaningful support — Repeatedly refusing appropriate support or help while ongoing harmful behavior remains unaddressed.
  • Demanding immediate forgiveness — Avoiding responsibility for harm through denial, delay, double standards, or empty gestures.
  • Excuse-making — Offering justifications that minimize harm instead of taking responsibility for it.
  • Externalizing blame — Attributing harmful choices to other people, circumstances, or forces outside oneself.
  • Lack of self-reflection — Repeatedly avoiding honest reflection on how their behavior affects others or making excuses instead of engaging with feedback.
  • Never apologizing — Refusing to acknowledge harm or offer a genuine apology when one is warranted.
  • Non-apologies — Recognizable forms include “I'm sorry, but…,” “I'm sorry you feel that way,” apologies paired with blame, and apologies used to shut down discussion.
  • Performative remorse — Displaying regret for appearance or to regain access without meaningful accountability.
  • Promises without change — Apologies or commitments to improve that are not followed by sustained behavior change.
  • Refusing repair — Declining to address harm, rebuild trust, or take steps to make amends.
  • Retaliating when confronted — Responding to concerns with punishment, anger, or counterattacks instead of engagement.
  • Treating consequences as persecution — Avoiding responsibility for harm through denial, delay, double standards, or empty gestures.
  • Using an apology to end discussion — Avoiding responsibility for harm through denial, delay, double standards, or empty gestures.

Relationship destabilization

Digital red flags

A note about this list

This site offers general educational information, not a diagnosis or medical, mental-health, legal, or professional advice. Every relationship and situation is different. If you are in immediate danger, contact local emergency services or a qualified crisis resource.

Get updates